Tom Jeffries wrote:I think the CKNW 2.0 is a weird move. They blow off the core audience of boomers with money and go after a demo that doesn't listen to AM radio!
This is like looking for a whale, using the wrong end of the binoculars.
F A I L.
Take a look at the drop in key demos and if it continues, CKNW is going to crash and burn.
Who cares about AM?
It's 2015, not 1965. People have so much choice.
Wonder what Plasteras thinks?
They should HIRE JJ Johnston back - as a consultant - give him two years and maybe he can save this mess.
Blabbermouth wrote:As I read someone say on another chat group, "CKNW 2.0" is referring to the station's predicted market share in the years to come.
pave wrote:Has the station's headquarters ever been known for having a significant lack of oxygen?
If so, that would get everybody off the hook.
Jim Walters wrote:
Do the people who have to work for that a-hole believe his bullshit or are they just collecting a pay check
?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 167 guests