Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Radio news from Alberta

Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby radiofan » Thu Aug 07, 2014 9:30 pm

Exclusive: Jann Arden says radio station’s QuickHitz ‘massacring’ music

BY MIKE BELL, CALGARY HERALD AUGUST 7, 2014 7:50 PM

Image

While not a physician, I’m pretty sure that what Jann Arden suggests is a physical impossibility — perhaps even illegal in some provinces.

But it speaks to the level of anger she’s feeling that all understandings of the anatomical workings of man should be thrown out the window when it comes to the powers that be at Calgary Top 40 station AMP Radio.

After reading news on calgaryherald.com of the station’s weekend switch to a new format called QuickHitz, which features abbreviated versions of popular songs done by Vancouver company SparkNet Communications, Arden went on a Twitter tirade that lasted most of Thursday.

When reached at her home just outside the city’s limits in the late afternoon, she was still angered enough to recommend that those at AMP, er, insert things in places where no orifice normally exist.

“It’s maddening, it really is,” Arden says of the new format, calling it the “massacring of an artist’s work.”

“It happens all the time, but this is extreme.”

As explained to the Herald by Steve Jones, VP of Programming for Newcap Radio — the company that owns almost 100 stations across Canada, including AMP — the QuickHitz format cuts a song in half in order for the station to play more songs, by more artists. The rough estimate is that the new format allows for 24 songs in one hour, compared with an average of 12.

Jones argued that the four-minute song is an archaic practice originally dictated by radio and the 45 RPM, and that the idea of radio edits to get down to that magic three- or four-minutes was used on such epics as Don McLean’s American Pie to current hits such as John Legend’s All of Me.

Arden acknowledges the idea of radio edits and admits she’s heard her own songs faded out early or had intros cut short, and says she’s fine with it. But the QuickHitz approach, she says, goes too far, calling it “blasphemy” to both the artist and the listener.

“They’re saying that you’re so stupid that you’re not even going to notice,” she says. “And maybe some people don’t. If that’s what they want to listen to, I mean, it’s a free world. But for me as an artist, please don’t play my music, AMP. I don’t give a s---. Please don’t ever play it.”

She quickly adds. “Not that they ever do. They’d never play me in a million years. But I’ve never been so glad to be on the outside looking in at what’s considered to be pop music.”

That, actually, was another point that Jones made, was that the Top 40 or pop music format was perfect for the QuickHitz treatment in that it’s “music of the moment” and that these days moments are even more fleeting. The idea that it’s seen as more disposable and therefore subject to being made more easily consumed by cleaving it into smaller, digestible bits, is one that Arden sees as a dangerous thing, calling it an “offensive, ignorant statement.”

“And it’s belittling art of any kind,” she says. “There are all kinds of different music . . . There’s Leonard Cohen and there’s pop music that’s completely perceived as if it’s going to come and go in 10 minutes. That’s not the point. It really is not the point at all. If you start there, I liken it to, ‘Let’s just go and do an abridged version of every book that’s out there. It’s way more cost-effective for the publisher. There’s a lot of stuff in here that’s just describing things, and we’re going to take that out. At least they’re still kind of getting the story, they know what happens in the end, the Titanic sinks. But we don’t have to have the part in there where the band is playing.’

“It’s an impossibility in art. You can’t start doing that because it just turns into something really sinister.”

She’s hoping that other musicians in this country and around the world stand up and stop the QuickHitz movement before it takes hold — AMP is the first to commit to it full time but other stations have experimented with it.

And despite Jones telling the Herald that “artists are generally quite receptive to having their songs heard more often by more people,” Arden hopes that there will be a huge backlash by the real artists out there.

“That’s why my claws went up because it’s just insulting,” she says. “They’re saying, ‘Hey, artists are receptive to it.’ Well, you know what? If an artist is receptive to it then they’ve completely sold out. And they’re not my brothers and sisters in this kind of work. They’re people that will do anything to get on radio and I’m not interested in those people.”

As for the music industry, which Jones thinks will embrace and, possibly, be saved by the format, that’s where Arden has a little less faith. Noting that there is a certain amount of desperation to get songs and artists more exposure, she’s not entirely convinced that some day her record company might not come to her asking for a two-minute song.

Still, she holds out hope that radio will reject the idea, noting there are a great many people in the medium who have an authentic love and respect for music, many of whom reached out to her off the record to support her Twitter-vent.

As for AMP, she says they’re merely “grasping at straws” and that the format switch is less, as Jones says, about testing a “revolutionary” idea in a “forward-looking city” than doing anything it can to bail out the boat after it’s already hit the iceberg.

“I mean, this is brought to you by the morons that burned money instead of helping a hungry child,” she says, referring to a recent, controversial promotion that saw the station incinerate $5,000 rather than give it to charity.

“They’re going to sink. They’re not going to make it . . . it’s just not going to fly.”

mbell@calgaryherald.com

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/calga ... story.html
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.
User avatar
radiofan
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 13779
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:24 pm
Location: Keremeos, BC

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby MonteVideo » Thu Aug 07, 2014 11:07 pm

She makes valid points but thus ship has already sailed as artists have allowed editing of their music for years. And When was the last time you heard an instrumental break in a tune? Aha. I've run rings round you logically. Also K-tel. That is all.
shoop shoop diddy wah
User avatar
MonteVideo
Member
 
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 12:56 am

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby slowhand » Fri Aug 08, 2014 7:51 am

The Doors were even more upset than Jann after they signed to Electra, recorded Light My Fire and could not get it released as a single without minutes of it removed.

In that era, Tommy James stood out as the exception where his Crimson and Clover was actually originally recorded as the single version. A longer album version was cobbled together later. There is even a wowed edit in the vinyl LP version of the song.
User avatar
slowhand
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:03 pm

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby 45 RPM » Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:43 am

slowhand wrote:The Doors were even more upset than Jann after they signed to Electra, recorded Light My Fire and could not get it released as a single without minutes of it removed.

In that era, Tommy James stood out as the exception where his Crimson and Clover was actually originally recorded as the single version. A longer album version was cobbled together later. There is even a wowed edit in the vinyl LP version of the song.


Record companies doing edits with their artist's songs is one thing.

Radio stations doing massive edits is totally unacceptable.

Good on Jann for speaking out about this issue.

AMP is just another in a long list of blunders NwCap has made in the west.
User avatar
45 RPM
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:01 am
Location: Hanna, AB

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby Blabbermouth » Fri Aug 08, 2014 10:14 am

45 RPM wrote:Record companies doing edits with their artist's songs is one thing.

Radio stations doing massive edits is totally unacceptable.

Good on Jann for speaking out about this issue.

AMP is just another in a long list of blunders NwCap has made in the west.



Well put. It's not only disrespecting the artist, it's underestimating the intelligence of the the listener.
Blabbermouth
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:33 pm

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby skyvalleyradio » Fri Aug 08, 2014 12:00 pm

"Quickhitz" is not only an insult to artist, but to intelligent listeners as well. Radio designed for short attention spans...radio by pinheads for pinheads :carrot:
User avatar
skyvalleyradio
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 1:16 pm
Location: The Goofy Islands

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby Eldon-Mr.CFAY » Fri Aug 08, 2014 2:27 pm

Greetings,
Totally agree with you Sky Valley and Jan Arden too. What a totally crappy format AMP radio is doing! Hope no other stations try this. A complete disrespect for music!

73s All the Best from Eldon
Bye . . Mr. CFAY "Frequently On The Frequency"
The CFAY Website: http://cfayradio.wordpress.com
CFAY Radio: http://tinyurl.com/l9qqmh
User avatar
Eldon-Mr.CFAY
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 526
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:09 pm
Location: P.O. Box 3536, Langley, BC V3A 4R9

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby pave » Fri Aug 08, 2014 4:35 pm

Perhaps this is one of those strategies cooked up by "the smartest programming minds in the world".
Then again, it might be just another wild-eyed move of desperation by a bunch of panicked, ill-informed and under-equipped suits.
Meanwhile, Jann looks great!
pave
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:22 pm

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby jon » Fri Aug 08, 2014 7:00 pm

I think my suggestion, in another thread, that Newcap is only Stunting with QuickHitz, is now more likely than it was before the Jann Arden rant. Or, to put it more clearly, they might now want to spin doctor this whole fiasco into a "just kidding" response of "we were only stunting with the format".

Pat St. John got a surprise phone call this afternoon on SiriusXM 60s on 6 from Dennis Tufano, lead vocal for The Buckinghams. One thing they talked about was the odd reverse sequence near the end of "Susan". Some Production guru added it after The Buckinghams left the studio and they first heard it while they were on the road and the single was released. To a Man, they all hated it. Pat talked about stations "carting" that song after editing out that part, and never playing the vinyl version on air.

A lot of songs got shortened for air play by radio stations in the '60s, most frequently just being cued past some unwanted intro, or cutting off the end. Lest we forget, there was also what might be called OverClocking: speeding up turntables for a number of years at some stations.

All that said, I think QuickHitz is a really dumb idea. Even though there were certainly some songs over the years that were just too repetitive for my tastes. Paul Revere and the Raiders' version of "Indian Reservation" comes to mind as one that could have used a shorter version.
User avatar
jon
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Edmonton

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby hagopian » Fri Aug 08, 2014 9:00 pm

We would shave stuff, and even drop heavy lead guitar shots, at one Station.

Then there's the story about "The Righteous Brothers" - "You've Lost That Lovin' Feeling" - being 4:32 and way too long for the tight Drake formats.

So what did Spector do, did he cut it?

No: Just reprinted the label with a shorter time (*think it was 3:23) - and BAM, a smash.

It's not up to radio to chop a song and I think the New Cap "genius" that came up with this best not show up at any live music gigs, or he'll be eating a Gibson Guitar, without salt.
User avatar
hagopian
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1188
Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby Recordman » Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:36 pm

I was wondering if this would be a violation of CRTC regulations with regards to Can-Con.Didn`t think this editing of Can-Con would be allowed.
Don`t think it is right for a station to play part songs instead of whole songs.
If they(New Cap) want to play short songs,why not look at an oldies format 50`s and 60`s when most song were less than three minutes long.
I agree with Jann Arden.
Recordman
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:29 pm

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby jon » Sun Aug 10, 2014 3:48 pm

Recordman wrote:I was wondering if this would be a violation of CRTC regulations with regards to Can-Con.Didn`t think this editing of Can-Con would be allowed.
Don`t think it is right for a station to play part songs instead of whole songs.
If they(New Cap) want to play short songs,why not look at an oldies format 50`s and 60`s when most song were less than three minutes long.
I agree with Jann Arden.

From another thread:

jon wrote:
Aaron wrote:(8) Except as otherwise provided under a condition of its licence that refers expressly to this subsection and subject to subsection (6), an A.M. licensee, F.M. licensee or digital radio licensee that is licensed to operate a commercial station, community station or campus station shall, in a broadcast week, devote at least 35% of its musical selections from content category 2 to Canadian selections broadcast in their entirety.

Not sure that the CRTC has considered the issue of musical selections NOT played in their entirety. Clearly, music in commercials or imaging doesn't count.

Until the CRTC clarifies the issue, I suspect that a clever legal department would argue that AMP is not playing any musical selections to which CanCon rules apply.

Or, to put it another way, what is good for the gander is good for the goose. If CanCon not played in its entirety doesn't count, then why should non-CanCon count if it is not played in its entirety?

Lawyers could spin this one out several ways if challenged by the CRTC.

My guess is that the CRTC will come out with a specific ruling on the matter, in essence saying that, for songs not played in their entirety, CanCon selections not played in their entirety count, and are required.
User avatar
jon
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 9262
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Edmonton

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby Aaron » Sun Aug 10, 2014 8:03 pm

Recordman wrote:I was wondering if this would be a violation of CRTC regulations with regards to Can-Con.Didn`t think this editing of Can-Con would be allowed.
Don`t think it is right for a station to play part songs instead of whole songs.
If they(New Cap) want to play short songs,why not look at an oldies format 50`s and 60`s when most song were less than three minutes long.
I agree with Jann Arden.


Correct, it is an explicit violation of CRTC regulations. Couldn't be any clearer.
Aaron
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 782
Joined: Sun Jun 11, 2006 7:21 pm

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby 45 RPM » Sun Aug 10, 2014 9:20 pm

How ironic is it that Jann Arden was the celebrity MC for the launch of Newap's 103.1 The Breeze?

How much does Newcp pay FACTOR a year to support Canadian Talent and then they bastardize any Canadian music they play?

I gues AMP figures any publicity is FREE advertsing. This move will come back to bite them in the butt.
User avatar
45 RPM
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 228
Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2007 11:01 am
Location: Hanna, AB

Re: Jann Arden speaks out about AMP

Postby pave » Mon Aug 11, 2014 5:56 am

Like so many others on this board, I also remember speeding up the tunes a few percentage points. This was to add "excitement and intensity" -- a manipulation of the records that were already hits by the time we got around to playing them.

Another expensive and time-wasting exercise was having jingles delivered in every key -- in order to male a jingle-song transition more appealing. (It was, indeed, more pleasant, but it didn't produce any measurable or, for that matter, pleasing, subjective responses from audiences.)

But then, as it applies to this stunting from Amp (NewCap), I submit it does demonstrate a noticeable desperation. They go to the cupboard and find it is bare. They reach behind for an arrow and find an empty quiver. And all this is happening in a contemporary environment where communicative options are lying all over the ground like so many premature crab apples.
pave
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1620
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:22 pm

Next

Return to Alberta

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 157 guests