Bell Stops Throttling Its Internet

News, discussion and questions about technology and computers, whether broadcast-related or not.

Bell Stops Throttling Its Internet

Postby jon » Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:35 am

Bell Pulls Back Online Restrictions On Eve of Open Internet Anniversary

October 19, 2011—According to a recent email obtained by OpenMedia.ca, Bell has decided to start pulling back the discriminatory restrictions it has been imposing on online services for the last several years:

“Effective November 2011, new links implemented by Bell to augment our DSL network may not be subject to Technical Internet Traffic Management Practices (ITMP). [...]While congestion still exists, the impact of Peer-to-Peer file sharing applications on congestion has reduced.”

The restrictions imposed on the open Internet were never justified in the first place, and OpenMedia.ca is glad to see Bell moving away from the practice of throttling access to online services. The move draws further into question why Rogers and other big Internet service providers continue to employ the anti-competitive tactic.

Rogers has been in the center of a drawn-out controversy after it was caught slowing access to online games like the World of Warcraft. In a letter earlier this year, Rogers “recommend[ed] turning off the peer-to-peer setting in the World of Warcraft game and ensuring that no peer-to-peer applications are running on any connected computer."

Over the last few years, many Canadian ISPs have attempted to justify Internet openness violations by claiming that certain types of traffic, predominantly peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing traffic, are overwhelming their networks. Bell’s move today demonstrates clearly that this is not the case.

The move also reinforces findings from a report OpenMedia.ca released earlier this year. Entitled Casting An Open Net, the report demonstrates that restricting access online services—especially P2P services—is unjust and unnecessary.

OpenMedia.ca Executive Director Steve Anderson said today, “This announcement is further evidence that Rogers and other ISPs are breaking Internet openness rules when they restrict access to online services like peer-to-peer file-sharing. I’m not sure what more the CRTC needs to see in order to finally decide it’s necessary to audit ISPs to make sure they comply with Internet openness rules. Canadians have had enough of this.”

This week also marks the two-year anniversary of the CRTC’s decision to put forward traffic management rules (Internet openness rules) involving Internet openness. Backed by non-profit organizations, businesses, and Canadians across the country, OpenMedia.ca made the case for Internet openness at the 2009 hearings and declared victory when the CRTC made its decision.

Canadians can learn more about Internet openness, and sign a petition calling for an open Internet at http://openmedia.ca/saveournet.
User avatar
jon
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 9257
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Edmonton

Re: Bell Stops Throttling Its Internet

Postby Howaboutthat » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:17 pm

Rogers violating internet rules, CRTC says

CBC News

Posted: Oct 27, 2011 8:38 PM ET

The CRTC is investigating Rogers Communications because it believes the way the company deliberately slows down some of its internet traffic violates federal rules.

The probe stems from a complaint by the Canadian Gamers Organization, an advocacy group for people who play video games, that Rogers has been hindering online games.


Internet traffic management

Internet traffic management, sometimes called "traffic shaping," refers to techniques used by internet companies to slow down some types of network communications in favour of others. Some service providers throttle applications like peer-to-peer file sharing that use large amounts of bandwidth, but that don't effectively stop working when slowed.

Companies say that allows them to guarantee higher speeds and better quality for things like video streaming that don't work properly when slowed. However, problems can arise if the technology used to distinguish different types of applications mistakenly classifies time-sensitive traffic as peer-to-peer.

Rogers admitted in March that its network systems were unintentionally slowing down, or “throttling,” internet traffic for the game World of Warcraft, then said it had resolved the problem.

It further acknowledged in September that other games and programs might be getting tripped up by its throttling. The Canadian Gamers Organization's complaint detailed slow internet speeds experienced while playing Call of Duty: Black Ops.

The CRTC informed the gamers group on Thursday that it has referred the matter to its enforcement division, meaning commission staff consider Rogers to be violating the Telecommunications Act or CRTC regulations. Those rules allow throttling of peer-to-peer file sharing programs like BitTorrent, but not of time-sensitive internet traffic like video chatting or gaming.

“We are aware of several games that have had issues, but we don’t know 100 per cent right now. We can’t tell from the ends of the network,” said Jason Koblovsky, a Canadian Gamers Organization co-founder. “But it’s quite clear the CRTC thinks there’s something wrong.”

The CRTC’s enforcement division has the power to inspect Rogers equipment or order a third-party audit of the company’s internet systems. That could help give a more comprehensive picture of whether Rogers is illegally throttling games, or if the Call of Duty slowdowns are just part of broader internet congestion.

“There’s a lot of confusion and testing that needs to be done,” Koblovsky said. “Sometimes it can takes months of troubleshooting at the consumer’s end to determine whether it’s throttling or not.”

Rogers spokesperson Carly Suppa said in an email Thursday night that the company has "just received" a letter from the CRTC and "we are reviewing its contents." She repeated the company's position that it believes it is complying with CRTC rules.

If the CRTC confirms Rogers is in violation, the regulator can go so far as to order the company to partially reimburse customers and to change its practices.

Many critics denounce internet traffic management because it amounts to censorship over what content gets priority transmission on the internet, violating the principle of "net neutrality."
Houston, We're dealing with morons!.
User avatar
Howaboutthat
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 2510
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Vernon


Return to Computer & Technology News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests