tuned wrote:So I agree with you Mike, where we disagree is that you didn't support Sun TV's right to exist on the same basis as all the other news channels. So you're part of the problem. You don't mind media concentration as long as they cater to your point of view. Then when someone like Crull says something you don't like you get your panties in a twist. Sun TV got your panties in an even bigger twist and you had no problem with them getting shafted by the likes of Bell. So what side are you on?
tuned wrote:If you want to debate Dave I'll debate. If you want to be a troll and name call I'm not interested.
tuned wrote:"
Since you live in the land of the free you might not realize that Canadians are very soft on freedom of speech. Canadians only support speech that they agree with and feel that anything else should be banned by the government. Sun TV is a prime example. Tom Leykis and Howard Stern were run out of the country by the government because some people were offended by their content. Canadian tolerance is largely a myth.
tuned wrote:Since you live in the land of the free you might not realize that Canadians are very soft on freedom of speech. Canadians only support speech that they agree with and feel that anything else should be banned by the government. Sun TV is a prime example.
tuned wrote:Answer the questions and we will continue our little debate.
tuned wrote:Why am I forced to pay for CTV News, BC1 and CBC Newsworld? There is plenty of "non-news" and "propaganda" on all three channels so what was the difference with Sun News? I don't need a history lesson on where the channel came from because it's irrelevant.
tuned wrote:I never said Sun News was taken off the air because of free speech however Canadians are totally soft on free speech. Why was Tom Leykis censored and then taken off the air in Vancouver? Same with Howard Stern in Toronto?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 107 guests