Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby Jack Bennest » Wed Oct 16, 2013 7:12 am

Let's agree to disagree on some things

Not all of what the MIC and the governments/corp in this world have done - has been good for our planet.

As to Haarp - not sure that all that RF(EMW) is good for anything.

Climate change is occurring - my argument has always been - let's not debate the subject - let us set a course for cleaner air, cleaner water, cleaner soil - world wide. Lets "clean it up" and not waste energy arguing a point that may never be won.

But if we adopt a policy that a cleaner planet is more important than greed - then most of us will die happier. :groovy:
User avatar
Jack Bennest
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 4472
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:25 pm

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby Anotherwpgguy » Wed Oct 16, 2013 8:48 am

Will we be banned from Radiowest for heresy if we disagree and refuse to go to a work farm for politically correct re-education ..... as was the case with another "broadcast" forum site?

AWG
User avatar
Anotherwpgguy
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 8:46 pm
Location: West of Winnipeg

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby radiofan » Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:35 am

Anotherwpgguy wrote:Will we be banned from Radiowest for heresy if we disagree and refuse to go to a work farm for politically correct re-education ..... as was the case with another "broadcast" forum site?

AWG


No Sir!
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.
User avatar
radiofan
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 13770
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:24 pm
Location: Keremeos, BC

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby Anotherwpgguy » Thu Oct 17, 2013 8:13 pm

Well then .... that's good news!
User avatar
Anotherwpgguy
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 460
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 8:46 pm
Location: West of Winnipeg

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby Jack Bennest » Sat Oct 19, 2013 9:59 am

Right on!

or is that :walk:

West on!
User avatar
Jack Bennest
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 4472
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:25 pm

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby pave » Mon Oct 21, 2013 11:13 am

Not only did I get banned, I was sentenced to eternal damnation in a lake of actual fire - not that I wasn't given a really keen choice.
I was so distraught, I went out and ran a yellow light.
pave
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1619
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:22 pm

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby slowhand » Mon Oct 21, 2013 12:38 pm

The target keeps moving. Now a simple 4 engine weekend flight over Chemtrail Capital Edmonton is proof of Geoengineering.

Image
User avatar
slowhand
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 756
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 2:03 pm

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby tkd » Mon Oct 21, 2013 12:58 pm

have you been taking any of these chemicals???
tkd
Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 1:59 pm

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby pave » Mon Oct 21, 2013 2:59 pm

They wouldn't dare try that in Calgary -- those rotten bastardos.
pave
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1619
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:22 pm

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby PMC » Mon Oct 21, 2013 9:25 pm

Those that complain rarely offer solutions...

If an effort is made to build high speed rail in america. If available from downtown to downtown, many would take the train rather than fly, and as they do in Europe or Asia.
PMC
 

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby pave » Mon Oct 21, 2013 10:20 pm

Given the number of derailments taking place over the last months, a multi billion dollar not-quite-as-fast-as-a-speeding-bullet train might be a bit of a laffer in those parts.
Besides, who wants to go to Edmonton anyway...?
pave
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1619
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:22 pm

Re: Chem Trails warning in Penticton

Postby jon » Tue Oct 22, 2013 8:22 am

pave wrote:Besides, who wants to go to Edmonton anyway...?

Almost everyone who works in Fort McMurray and the surrounding Oil Sands job sites.

Not making the News is the huge increase in rail traffic for the Oil Industry. In at least one case, a delay in a proposed pipeline has the company already transporting the same as the proposed daily pipeline volume by rail tanker cars.
User avatar
jon
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 9259
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Edmonton

Previous

Return to Non Radio Related Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests