interiormotive wrote:Just curious to know if you all think that sports on the radio has received a resurgence since the TEAM 1040 took over the Canucks. Its almost as if they've made sports radio cool again, and not just for the macho.
I like what I am hearing on a number of fronts media wise, but sports radio seems to be on everyone's radar right now, even though the 'numbers' suggest otherwise.
Who is to credit for the great sound?
glaherty wrote:The question will be, can you get the highly inexact BBM ratings to reflect it.
No matter what you think of how the games are sounding on 1040, you have
to KNOW that people are listening, will the BBM reflect that with what should
be a 2.5-3.0 share, or will NW's misdirection campaign fool the apparently
quite gullible voters? How are these ballots distributed by the way? Completely
at random?
glaherty wrote: From a sales standpoint, 1040 is jammed to the rafters, there
is no doubt things are booming there, but it's fairly good all around right now
I understand. The Team is not a perfect product, but it is a station that uses
only "talk" to generate programming, so I'm always amused when it's compared
to music stations in terms of market reach.
tuned wrote: The great sound of 1040? Obviously the poster works for Chum but I beg to differ on the "sound" of the station.? It sounds mickey mouse just like everything else they do.? The imaging is uninspired and just plain cheap sounding.? What's with the same guy yelling "you're on the Team 1040" all the time? People will listen because they have the 'nucks just like any dog will be my pal if I have treats in my pocket.? I have no use for Chum because I've dealt with them for two decades, have friends who work for them and have had to endure their sad sack stations polluting the airwaves.? The company is run by a bunch of no-talent bozo's who got their positions through family connections.? They are the bottomfeeders of Canadian broadcasting which is exactly why they haven't been very successful and wound up getting bought out.? I am hoping BCE clears out the empty suits and cabal of menopausal nasties that run the place out of Queen Street.
glaherty wrote:tuned wrote: ? The imaging is uninspired and just plain cheap sounding.? What's with the same guy yelling "you're on the Team 1040" all the time?
Well tuned, I've worked for Chum with the Team 1040 for the last 6 years, off and on, and I couldn't possibly disagree with you more. 1040 has built a market niche, from absolute SCRATCH, to become a fixture on the dial for most males, and has become the rightsholders for the two main franchises in the market. They also paid over 6 million dollars in rightsfees, but I guess they're just cheap. It is FAR from a perfect company, but I'll take the people I work
with there, and have been associated with for the past 6 years, over most of the other organizations any DAY of the frickin week. They (we) have also been a huge thorn in NW's side, if you doubt that, you should sit in on some of their meetings, they are OBSESSED with the rivalry. We on the other hand, are just happy to have a foothold in the market, and are trying to do our best.
I'll be happy to discuss Chum's pros and cons with you, but you're so fixated and militant about the cons I doubt it would be very edifying.
Lee Powell.
interiormotive wrote: I heard Greg Douglas on the other day, is he a staffer?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 236 guests