Our High Court says web link does not constitute defamation

Post items here [radio related or otherwise] that you have run across on the net that might be of interest to others

Our High Court says web link does not constitute defamation

Postby Tape Splicer » Wed Oct 19, 2011 6:01 pm

There was a lengthy discussion about "Freedom of Speech" recently on RW. - The Supreme court made a ruling today - dealing with hyperlinks. The following story is from The "Global National" web page.
=========================================================================================
Supreme Court of Canada says web link does not constitute defamation

The Canadian Press

Wednesday, October 19, 2011 11:58 AM

OTTAWA - The Supreme Court of Canada has unanimously upheld a lower court's ruling that linking to a website containing libellous material does not in itself constitute libel.

The top court ruled Wednesday against Wayne Crookes, a former Green party campaign manager who argued that posting links to sites with defamatory statements was the same as publishing the defamatory material.

The website in question did not reproduce any of the disputed material, nor did it make any comment on it.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court said there is a difference between simply linking to a website and actively encouraging someone to follow a link to a website with defamatory content.

"Making reference to the existence and/or location of content by hyperlink or otherwise, without more, is not publication of that content," the court wrote in its decision.

"Only when a hyperlinker presents content from the hyperlinked material in a way that actually repeats the defamatory content, should that content be considered to be 'published' by the hyperlinker.

"Such an approach promotes expression and respects the realities of the Internet, while creating little or no limitations to a plaintiff's ability to vindicate his or her reputation."

Justice Stephen Kelleher of the B.C. Supreme Court had dismissed Crookes's case, saying the links were like a footnote or a website reference in a newsletter.

Crookes had launched several libel actions against members of the Green Party of Canada, Google, Myspace.com and Wikipedia.

There were concerns that a decision siding with Crookes would have a chilling effect on the web.

"The ruling is a huge win for the Internet," said Michael Geist, a University of Ottawa law professor who holds the Canada research chair in Internet and e-commerce law.

"The Supreme Court of Canada clearly understood the technology, I think they understand the Internet. They, most importantly in this case, understand the direct link — no pun intended — between hyperlinks on the Internet and freedom of expression and the ability to disseminate information."

© The Canadian Press, 2011

Here is the hyperlink to The "Global National" web page

http://www.globalnational.com/6442504253/story.html
Tape Splicer
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 788
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 4:45 pm

Return to Rip 'N' Read ... aka Cut 'N' Paste

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron