Dan Sys wrote:This is the second stupid decision the CRTC has come down with in as many weeks (the other being the rejection of Barry Wall's application in Prince Rupert). In both cases voice tracked crap from other markets was chosen over locally produced programming. Has the CRTC totally caved in to the corporate giants now? What ever happened to their "local comes first" policy?
Mr. Wall & Fabmar should make an issue out of this.
I learned a lot about the CRTC from the transcripts of the Edmonton hearings a few years ago. Or, more correctly, about the thinking of individual CRTC commissioners.
It came through very clearly that they wanted as many owners as possible to have more than one station in a market. Economies of scale and all that sort of thing. All of which harkens back to a CRTC mandate that goes back to the BBG and prior: unlike the FCC, the CRTC is responsible for licensing stations that will stay afloat financially.
To me, the argument about the CRTC's licensing practices is not so much whether I agree or disagree with the parameters in their licensing mandate, but in the priorities they assign to each mandate. I certainly think that they put too much emphasis on financial stability. But, at the same time, I will admit to finding it easy to forget a time less than 20 years ago when the financial viability of a lot of radio stations in this country was really in question.