Sacramento Radio Contest Deadly

Radio news from the USA

Postby radiofan » Sun Jan 14, 2007 12:51 am

Woman dies after taking part in water drinking contest
By Ryan Lillis - Bee Staff Writer
Published 9:10 pm PST Saturday, January 13, 2007

A 28-year-old mother of three died from water intoxication hours after competing in a radio station contest to see which contestant could drink the most water without urinating, according to a preliminary autopsy results released Saturday.

Jennifer Lea Strange was found dead by a family member in her Rancho Cordova home around 2 p.m. Friday, authorities said. Sacramento County Assistant Coroner Ed Smith said Strange's mother and husband told coroner's officials the young woman had taken part in a contest at The End (KDND, 107.9 FM) on Friday morning that was based on drinking large amounts of water.

The winner of the contest reportedly won a new video game system.

Strange told co-workers that she planned to take part in the contest before going to work, and that she was trying to win the game system for her three young children.

Smith described the amount of water Strange drank as "excessive."

A preliminary autopsy "revealed no life threatening medical conditions to explain (Strange's) sudden death" and initial findings were "consistent with a water intoxication death," according to a coroner's office statement issued Saturday.

The final cause of death is not expected for several months, the statement said.

"We don't really know for sure how much she drank," Smith said. "But to get water intoxication, you have to drink a lot."

Sacramento sheriff's Sgt. Tim Curran, a department spokesman, said there would not be an investigation because "this is not a criminal matter."

The Sacramento Bee
Those who danced were thought to be quite insane by those who couldn't hear the music.
User avatar
Advanced Member
Posts: 11186
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 2:24 pm
Location: Keremeos, BC

Postby Glen Livingstone » Sun Jan 14, 2007 1:53 pm

Remember the good old days when radio station contests didn't involve killing the contestants?
User avatar
Glen Livingstone
Advanced Member
Posts: 951
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 8:12 pm

Postby kat » Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:01 pm

Some interesting comments on the Sacramento Radio Info Board
The world has two kinds of people. Cat people and idiots.
User avatar
Advanced Member
Posts: 532
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 9:36 pm
Location: Bellingham, WA

Postby jon » Tue Jan 16, 2007 12:56 pm

Reelradio is also run from Sacramento, and the curator has noted that it now the third day in a row that the story is on the front page of The Sacramento Bee newspaper.

Of special note is the nurse who was ridiculed when she phoned in to warn of the danger.
User avatar
Advanced Member
Posts: 9211
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Edmonton

$16.6 Million Awarded by Jury

Postby jon » Thu Oct 29, 2009 9:02 pm

Jury awards $16.57 million to radio contestant's survivors
Published Thursday, Oct. 29, 2009

A Sacramento Superior Court jury today awarded the survivors of Jennifer Lea Strange $16,577,118 as a result of her death nearly three years ago in a water-drinking contest conducted by a local radio station.

In making the award, the seven-man, five-woman panel voted unanimously to find that Entercom Sacramento LLC, the local subsidiary of Entercom Communications Corp. of Philadelphia was negligent in putting on the contest that ultimately resulted in Strange's death.

The jury, also unanimously, exonerated the parent company.

Jurors also voted 10-2 that there was no contributory negligence on Strange's part.

"I'm very thankful and appreciative that the jurors took their time and that they held the appropriate people accountable," Jennifer Strange's widower, Billy Strange, told reporters after the verdict was read.

Roger A. Dreyer, the attorney who represented Billy Strange and the two young children he had with Jennifer Strange, said the verdict will send a message to media outlets nationwide.

"This is a very powerful verdict that's gong to resonate across the country to the media," Dreyer said. "Every single radio station is going to understand what happened today. I don't know about you, but the size of the number is a pretty substantial sum. They're going to pay attention to it.

"I'm confident we're going to see how they administer everything across the board on contests. That's what this jury has done, more than anything," Dreyer added.

Charles Sipkins, a Los Angeles-based spokesman for Entercom, called the woman's death "a tragedy."

"Our hearts go out to all of her loved ones, including, in particular, her husband and children," Sipkins said in an e-mailed statement.

"While legal restrictions preclude is from commenting further, we respect the jury's decision and hope that it will assist the Strange family in coping with its loss."

Juror La Teisha Paggett said the verdict should send a message that "these stations need to be more cognizant of what they're doing and they need to take the time to do the research to make sure no one's harmed."

Tammy Elliott, another juror on the panel, said the evidence against Entercom Sacramento was "overwhelming."

The Sacramento subsidiary, she said, "had not followed their rules and guidelines that were set not only by Sacramento Entercom but the parent company. And if it had been done, I don't think this contest would have gone on, or if it did, it would have went on with medical personnel and it would have been put on in a safe way."

In breaking down the plaintiffs' award, the jurors voted 10-2 to give the survivors' $1,477,118 in economic damages related to Jennifer Strange's future earnings potential and 9-3 to present them with another $15.1 million in non-economic damages for the loss of her love, companionship and support.

Elliott said the jury deliberations were "very" heated when it came to the issue of the non-economic damages. She said the individual panel members were "all over the board on numbers." She said the final amount represented an average of figures that each juror came up with on their own.

Plaintiffs lawyers had asked the jury for an award for economic and non-economic damages in a range of $34 million to $44.3 million.

Strange, 28, died Jan. 12, 2007, after participating in what KDND "The End" 107.9 promoted as its "Hold Your Wee for a Wii" contest that promised the popular Nintendo video game to whomever could drink the most water without urinating or vomiting.

The Sacramento County Coroner's Office determined that she died of acute water intoxication. The Sacramento County Sheriff's Department investigated the case to see if it was a homicide, but no criminal charges were filed.

Plaintiffs attorneys filed the wrongful death lawsuit on behalf of her husband, William Strange, individually and as guardian of their two young children, Ryland, 6, and Jorie, 3; and Ronald Sims, the father and guardian of the woman's oldest son, Keegan, 13. The plaintiffs charged that the defendants were negligent in holding the contest.

Defense attorneys countered that Strange's death was unforeseeable and that if there was any liability on the part of the Entercom defendants, it had to be offset by the woman's own "contributory negligence."

Forty-one witnesses testified and lawyers entered 192 exhibits into evidence in the trial that began on Sept. 8 with jury selection.

To prove their case, plaintiffs attorneys Roger A. Dreyer and Harvey R. Levine needed to demonstrate that KDND's "Morning Rave" on-air talent and the station's managers acted negligently within the course and scope of their employment at Entercom Sacramento in putting on the contest and that it caused harm to Jennifer Strange.

The plaintiffs lawyers played tapes of the "Morning Rave" show the day of the contest, where the disc jockeys made fun about contestants throwing up and about the possibility of somebody dying from drinking too much water. The jokes continued even after the DJs received several calls - including some they played on the air - from listeners who expressed concerns that drinking too much water could be dangerous, plaintiffs argued.

Station manager Steve Weed and Entercom's top official in Sacramento, John Geary, both had received complaints ahead of time about the behavior and antics of the "Morning Rave" crew from KDND promotions director Robin Pechota, the plaintiffs argued. But management failed to rein in the DJs, the lawyers said.

Although the antics of the DJs held the potential to expose Entercom Sacramento to liability, Judge Lloyd A. Phillips instructed the jury that Entercom Communications Corp. could not be found negligent for the actions of its subsidiary employees "merely by reason of ownership or control."

The lawyers for Strange's survivors asked jurors to establish the connection of liability to the parent corporation through what the plaintiffs viewed as a lack of training the subsidiary's managers received from Entercom Communication Corp.'s legal team in Boston. The plaintiffs lawyers argued that the corporate lawyers never educated or clearly communicated to the Sacramento managers the company's policies barring contests that were dangerous, in bad taste, or that reflected poorly on the morals and ethics of the company, and that the word in turn then never filtered down to the on-air talent.

Steve Maney, one of the DJs on KDND's morning show, testified that neither Geary, Weed or Pechota ever talked to any of the "Morning Rave" crew about contest guidelines.

"We were never told what the rules were," said Maney, who described himself to the jury as the morning crew's in-house "jackass."

Entercom's lawyers countered that its legal staff adequately trained Pechota and Weed on contest guidelines but that the Sacramento radio station officials then improperly used their own discretion in allowing a contest to go forward that did not comply with the company's policies.

"It wasn't a failure to get the message," Entercom attorney Donald W. Carlson said in his closing argument. "They all knew it."

The decision by the Sacramento managers to give a green light to the contest, as well as the behavior by the morning DJs during the course of the show, all tied in back to the main defense theme of the case, Carlson said - that nobody who worked for the station thought that drinking too much water could cause harm.

Carlson called only four witnesses in his one-day defense of Entercom. Two of them were contest participants who testified that they didn't think the contest was dangerous and that they felt free to drop out at any time.

The defense lawyer said that the contest came down to "a matter of personal choice" on who wanted to enter, and that Jennifer Strange had to bear a portion of her own "contributory negligence" that had to be factored into the jury's decision. She saw other people throwing up during the contest, Carlson said, and therefore knew there was a possibility of harm.

The case went to the jury Oct. 15 after attorneys for both sides concluded their closing arguments and the panel deliberated over nine court days before returning its verdict today.

During the course of their deliberations, jurors asked the judge for a definition on "scope of employment," a key issue in determining liability for the Entercom defendants based on the actions of their employees.

Jurors also asked for readbacks on the testimony of Geary, Weed, Pechota and the company's attorneys John Donlevie and Carmela Masi.

The jury also asked for an Excel computer program, a request that Phillips denied, although the judge did agree to provide the panel with a 10-digit adding machine.

In its final request last Friday, the jury was allowed to listen to all the audio on KDND in which Jennifer Strange was talking to the station's on-air talent.

The jury had no requests for readbacks or clarification questions this week.
User avatar
Advanced Member
Posts: 9211
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:15 am
Location: Edmonton

Re: Sacramento Radio Contest Deadly

Postby boyabouttown » Fri Oct 30, 2009 9:55 am

Echoing Kat's earlier post about the conversation going on at the Sacramento board. Of note is the smackdown being applied to one poster who tries to defend the station. ... 817.0.html
Posts: 19
Joined: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:04 am

Re: Sacramento Radio Contest Deadly

Postby tuned » Fri Oct 30, 2009 10:38 am

They are both idiots. The radio station ran a stupid contest and the woman stupidly went along with it. To put zero personal responsibility on the woman for her own tragic demise is crazy. What if the station ran a "what made the chicken cross the road" contest where listeners are invited to try and cross a busy highway to win a prize? The radio station should be fined by the FCC in the millions of dollars to make sure it doesn't happen again and the woman's estate should get a reasonable amount to take care of her family.
User avatar
Advanced Member
Posts: 1210
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 6:06 pm

Re: Sacramento Radio Contest Deadly

Postby paddyboyyy » Fri Oct 30, 2009 7:15 pm

tuned wrote:They are both idiots. The radio station ran a stupid contest and the woman stupidly went along with it. To put zero personal responsibility on the woman for her own tragic demise is crazy. What if the station ran a "what made the chicken cross the road" contest where listeners are invited to try and cross a busy highway to win a prize? The radio station should be fined by the FCC in the millions of dollars to make sure it doesn't happen again and the woman's estate should get a reasonable amount to take care of her family.

There's no personal responsibility anymore. It's ALWAYS someone else's fault especially if they have deep pockets. Our personal safety and wellbeing is the department of a perfect stranger we have never met and god help them if they don't keep us safe from harm.
We sure as hell can't handle THAT responsibility ourselves now can we? :evil: :x

Return to US Radio News

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest