Thick Skin Discussion

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby freqfreak2 » Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:38 pm

Jack Bennest wrote:
Donald R wrote:due to a technical glitch my access was denied. Donald R

How do you know this highlighted statement is true?


Good point. Might just have been atmospheric conditions.
freqfreak2
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:38 am

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby yathink » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:00 am

freqfreak2 wrote:
Jack Bennest wrote:
Donald R wrote:due to a technical glitch my access was denied. Donald R

How do you know this highlighted statement is true?


Good point. Might just have been atmospheric conditions.



Atmospheric conditions?....like....chemtrails??
I can't give you a brain, but I can give you a diploma.
User avatar
yathink
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:07 pm

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby freqfreak2 » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:04 am

yathink wrote:Atmospheric conditions?....like....chemtrails??


Congrats. You now advance to the quarter-finals.
freqfreak2
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:38 am

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby yathink » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:08 am

freqfreak2 wrote:
yathink wrote:Atmospheric conditions?....like....chemtrails??


Congrats. You now advance to the quarter-finals.



That's a good thing? Or a bad thing?
I can't give you a brain, but I can give you a diploma.
User avatar
yathink
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 85
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:07 pm

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby freqfreak2 » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:16 am

yathink wrote:That's a good thing? Or a bad thing?

Dunno. Your own mileage may vary.

Sarcasm, like a funny cloud, often passes over people's heads. Just wanted to thank you for making the reference clear for the uninitiated.

We now re-join our regular programming - already in progress.
freqfreak2
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 549
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:38 am

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby PMC » Thu Dec 30, 2010 12:50 am

Jack,

If someone wants to know who someone is, there is a personal pm message to ask the question. The writer can also identify oneself... this also applies to the lurkers (those that read the content, and don't engage in an active subject) using a pm message.

When I read the input of others, I can sometimes figure out who the writer is, by the content that they write of... as example today I read a comment from `pave' about SportChek and now know who, `pave' really is, because I lived/worked in Calgary.

As was pointed out, some can read the content and accept it for its written value, and not for what may be interpreted in the abstract of the lines.

The forum rule has always been `Don't offend and don't be offended'. The human social animal nature varies. I agree with Kim too.
PMC
 

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby Neumann Sennheiser » Thu Dec 30, 2010 7:53 am

Show up, suit up, always tell the truth, and don't become too attached to the results.
"You don't know man! I was in radio man! I've seen things you wouldn't believe!"
User avatar
Neumann Sennheiser
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 1129
Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Port Ludlow, Washington, USA

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby Jack Bennest » Thu Dec 30, 2010 9:13 am

Sometimes - I have to go back to the beginning to figure out what this thread was about.

I am sorry that at least three people I know quite well have decided to go into the shadows on a voluntary basis. I just wanted to discuss a
way in which certain people could play unattended in their own sandbox.

On another front I have been involved in these boards for a long time, been kicked off the best of them - started my own failures, participated fully etc.
I now notice that most of the shit disturbers have left - as well - the strong remain.

Long live chem trails and the lord praise you all. lol :gbhouse:
User avatar
Jack Bennest
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 4472
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:25 pm

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby PMC » Thu Dec 30, 2010 10:30 am

Jack Bennest wrote:Sometimes - I have to go back to the beginning to figure out what this thread was about.

I am sorry that at least three people I know quite well have decided to go into the shadows on a voluntary basis. I just wanted to discuss a
way in which certain people could play unattended in their own sandbox.


Use the pm feature of the board sending to multiple members... or conventional e-mail that is cc: 'd... the little buttons to the right of this message for those that haven't clicked one.
PMC
 

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby BossRadio » Fri Dec 31, 2010 7:38 am

The "cc" function. Love it, embrace it,because it could save your unhacked behind someday. :victory:
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum
BossRadio
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 361
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 9:09 am
Location: the outskirts of the edge of the fringe of the centre of the universe

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby Destro » Fri Dec 31, 2010 5:26 pm

Paul P wrote:Whatever, mom.


Jack, I always thought you were a dude. whoa... I think we should have to post our real names and GENDER!

ha... I like my handle. If you wanna know who I really am, click the blog link at the bottom :P then subscribe!
blog: http://morningaftershow.wordpress.com "A voice of reason amongst the doubters!" - Sandclan
User avatar
Destro
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 10:13 pm

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby Jack Bennest » Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:35 pm

Happy New Year Jer - I have always known who you are.

People call be mom for a reason - the gentle story teller that I am - lol

:towel:
User avatar
Jack Bennest
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 4472
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:25 pm

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby J Kendrick » Sat Jan 01, 2011 6:49 pm

Jack Bennest wrote:People call be mom for a reason - - lol :towel:


Have you caught yourself a cold there, Jack? :-)
J Kendrick
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 619
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:45 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Re: Thick Skin Discussion

Postby Jack Bennest » Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:53 pm

No matter howe hard eye tri - it jest wont wark for be
User avatar
Jack Bennest
Advanced Member
 
Posts: 4472
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:25 pm

Previous

Return to Non Radio Related Topics

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 254 guests