jon wrote:The original CBC application simply says that the transmitter was already off the air at the time of their application (to delete it from the license of CBU).
jon wrote:The original CBC application simply says that the transmitter was already off the air at the time of their application (to delete it from the license of CBU).
Toomas Losin wrote:Thanks. Spectrum Direct doesn't have a listing for CKZN, only listing CKZU on 6160. That doesn't look good!
Looking at the CKZN transmitter site with online maps shows a single tower for CBN and a folded dipole plus reflector for CKZN just like what CKZU has. The resolution isn't good enough to show the antenna wires but the azimuth look similar to CKZU's antenna, in this case pointing towards northern Québec. Thanks to the curvature of the earth the Lower Mainland might get a bit of that if the beam is broad enough.
jon wrote:Interesting that CKZU is still on the air. Giving wrong information to the CRTC, no matter how minor, is never a good idea.
A quick search of the CRTC decisions has CKZN listed on the May 28th decision to renew the CBC's license. And no recent requests or decisions to delete them.
Toomas Losin wrote:Hush! If'n y'all call attention to it then CKZU won't have a chance to beat CKMO's unlicensed run from last year!
OnAir wrote:The inclusion of CKZU in the CRTC decision was a misprint. The service is to remain on air and plans for a new transmitter are in the works.
Most (if not all) of the other stations listed in that same decision were AM to FM conversions.
OnAir wrote:The inclusion of CKZU in the CRTC decision was a misprint. The service is to remain on air and plans for a new transmitter are in the works.
Most (if not all) of the other stations listed in that same decision were AM to FM conversions.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests